<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OCOT’s apprenticeship review ratios: 8:1 for reductions, in favour of employers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ottawaconstructionnews.com/national-news/ocots-apprenticeship-review-ratios-81-for-reductions-in-favour-of-employers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ottawaconstructionnews.com/national-news/ocots-apprenticeship-review-ratios-81-for-reductions-in-favour-of-employers/</link>
	<description>Construction industry news and leads for contractors, sub-trades, architects, engineers and suppliers in Ottawa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 04:10:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CNGRP		</title>
		<link>https://ottawaconstructionnews.com/national-news/ocots-apprenticeship-review-ratios-81-for-reductions-in-favour-of-employers/#comment-619</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CNGRP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ottawaconstructionnews.com/?p=1215#comment-619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ottawaconstructionnews.com/national-news/ocots-apprenticeship-review-ratios-81-for-reductions-in-favour-of-employers/#comment-618&quot;&gt;karl&lt;/a&gt;.

Probably not.  The existing 1:3 ratio applies for second and successive apprentices, until there are, as I understand it, seven journeymen, and then the ratio declines to 1:2.  This effectively allows larger organizations to add additional apprentices, but will do little for smaller businesses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ottawaconstructionnews.com/national-news/ocots-apprenticeship-review-ratios-81-for-reductions-in-favour-of-employers/#comment-618">karl</a>.</p>
<p>Probably not.  The existing 1:3 ratio applies for second and successive apprentices, until there are, as I understand it, seven journeymen, and then the ratio declines to 1:2.  This effectively allows larger organizations to add additional apprentices, but will do little for smaller businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: karl		</title>
		<link>https://ottawaconstructionnews.com/national-news/ocots-apprenticeship-review-ratios-81-for-reductions-in-favour-of-employers/#comment-618</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[karl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ottawaconstructionnews.com/?p=1215#comment-618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[so  I am in sheet metal and  I have 1 journey man plus  me the owner (I am  a journey man also ) I have 1 apprentice now , can I get I more under new rules ? thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so  I am in sheet metal and  I have 1 journey man plus  me the owner (I am  a journey man also ) I have 1 apprentice now , can I get I more under new rules ? thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
